|
Post by brettsy on Sept 12, 2014 19:34:30 GMT
I did not enjoy reading this article. It's simply not my type of reading. I did find pieces of it to be interesting though. I was quite amused with how Edwards placed the facts about the Meerkats in the romance novel as if they belonged. I feel as if she could have plagiarized something else and it would have blended in so much better. Who's expecting that topic of facts in a romance novel? I find it mature yet necessary that he didn't file a law suit against her. Most people would've looked at it as a way to make money and not let her steel the writing. But I believe that Tolme knew that it was embarrassment enough for her with the attention that article gave her. I did, however, disagree with Tolme at the end of the article about his opinion on plagiarism. I realize that it is wrong and also a form of steeling, but i don't think that it is the issue that he makes it out to be. In the end, I think Edwards made a poor decision by plagiarizing in her romance novel not only because she stole but it didn't enhance her novel in any form.
|
|
|
Post by skylersobeski on Sept 14, 2014 19:37:55 GMT
Brett, I also thought it was funny that she even included Tolme's writing about the ferrets in her novel. I also agree that it was an embarrassment towards her. I hope that she realizes her mistake and how unfitting it was in her novel. I think that plagiarism is a big deal when you put yourself in the situation. However, I respect your opinion.
|
|
|
Post by Timothy Erwin on Sept 14, 2014 19:51:03 GMT
brettsy: I as well can respect your opinion that plagiarism isn’t as big of an issue Paul Tolme made it out to be, but I think it is important to remember that our experiences with writing is mostly for a grade (so plagiarism might not seem like a big deal), but for Paul Tolme and any professional writer their livelihood is writing, and often they find their identity in their work, the plagiarism on that level is a much greater offense.
|
|